Something I learnt from Stephen Hawking11 October 2014 Ever since I took up physics in year 11 I have had a love affair with the ubject, which is odd since I went on to study an arts/law degree ( but that probably had something to do with the implication that I would not have had the staying power to pour all of my energy into helping human knowledge advance towards establishing a unified theory).
Granted, Hawkings does suggest that if the ide of a infinite bounded universe ( do n't ask) turns out to be true then it would undermine God 's existence, however he does not actually say that this may be the case.
In fact his final sentence in this books is that the fac we study physics and try to find a unified theory is because we, as a race, seek to understand the essence of God.2) Stephen Hawkings is actually a really good writer This probably goes without saying, especially since the cover of my book says that it is a 'record breaking best seller'.
Okay, I probably have an advantage over most other people since my Dad is a quantu physicist that we have regular conversations about some of these high level concepts ( such as by having any more than three dimensions would cause the orbits of the lanets to collapse), but I still found that he was very difficul to follow and he explained many of these high level concepts in a way that any of us could understand.3) Scientists have a strange way of viewing the universe Many of us would be familiar with this guy: but as it turns out, after reading this autobiograph, I have come to the conclusion that a lot of theoretical physicists seem to live in the same world that he does.
Okay, they probably do n't spend their time at the comic book store, or arguing whether Babylon Five is better than Star Trek ( actually, one of my primary school friends is a quantu physicist, and we did have such an argument), but they do seem to see the world in a way that we ordinary people would consider strange.
Then there is the idea of dimensions: to us there are only three dimensions, however some scientists ( and Hawking is not one of them) see that there are in fact ten, or even more, dimensions.4) Why are so many scientists atheists While reading this nove I could not get past about how complex this universe is and it made me wonder why it is, with the mathematical precision of the universe, and the omplexity that lies therein, that so many scientists seem to argue that it all came about by chance.
When light hits a black hole the force of gravity is so wea that it will actually prevent light from escaping.
Okay, we know very little about the stuff ( and it is also a theory, so it has not been proven) but my hypothesis is that if this stuff exists then would it not have an effect upon light, namely by slowing it down, which means that there is a ossibility that our calculations as to the distance of stars from our own Sun could actually be wrong? 6) Scientists do not know as much as we think they know One of the guys that Hawking stresses in this ook is that theories are not actually proven.
Remember that penicillin was discovered by blind chance.8) Nobel Prizes are simply shiny baubles that have no merit Okay, maybe the people that win these prizes are actually really smart, but then again, the guys who set up Long-Term Capital Management also won a Nobel prize, which proves my point.9) Nobody really knows how gravity works Gravity is one of those odd forces that does n't seem to connect with any of the other forces in our universe.
It is interesting that in some texts that I have read ( maybe it is speculative science-fiction but I simply can not remember off the top of my head) some people have suggested that gravity is actually a force from another universe that affects our universe and what it is effectively doing is sucking our universe into their universe.
While I may be taking a swipe at creation scientists here, I would also take a swipe at the atheists who claim that there is no God. The eason I say that is because there seems to be a fear within the scientific community that suggests that we may not be ble to know stuff, or that our knowledg of the universe may be wrong.
The roblem that arises is that if we throw the idea of God out of the window and claim that the universe came about by chance, then we deny the fact that we live in an incredibly ordered universe that we can learn and understand through the development of mathematical formulae.
Okay, granted, God has intervened in this world and done things that break the la of science, but does n't he have a right to do that – he created the universe?